PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 11, 2026Journal of the American College of Cardiology76 citations

Treatment of Idiopathic Recurrent Pericarditis With Goflikicept

View Full Paper
VMV. Yu. MyachikovaОМО. М. МоисееваOVOksana V. Vinogradova

Key Result

Goflikicept significantly reduced the risk of pericarditis recurrence compared with placebo during a 24-week withdrawal period (0% vs 90%; P<0.001).

Key Points

  • To assess the efficacy and safety of goflikicept, a targeted interleukin-1 inhibitor, in resolving acute flares and preventing recurrences in idiopathic recurrent pericarditis.
  • Evaluated goflikicept in patients presenting with active idiopathic recurrent pericarditis and elevated systemic inflammatory markers.
  • Assessed time to pericarditis recurrence, changes in patient-reported pain scores, C-reactive protein levels, and tapering of concurrent corticosteroid therapy.
  • Goflikicept treatment produced rapid suppression of acute pericarditis symptoms and significantly reduced the risk of subsequent disease recurrences.
  • Patients achieved normalization of C-reactive protein levels alongside successful weaning and discontinuation of background corticosteroid regimens.

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=22)

Blinding

Open-label

Randomization

1:1

Multicenter

Yes

PICO

P
Population
22 patients with idiopathic recurrent pericarditis, 20 of whom were randomized to goflikicept or placebo for a 24-week withdrawal period.
I
Intervention / Comparator
Goflikicept vs Placebo
O
Primary Outcome
time to first pericarditis recurrence, p=<0.001

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 90%

p-value: p=<0.001

Abstract

BACKGROUND Idiopathic recurrent pericarditis (IRP) is a rare autoinflammatory disease. Interleukin (IL)-1α and IL-1β are the pivotal cytokines in the pathophysiology of acute pericarditis and its recurrence. We created a phase II/III study with a new IL-1 inhibitor-goflikicept in IRP. OBJECTIVES This study sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of goflikicept treatment in patients with IRP. METHODS We conducted a 2-center open-label study of goflikicept in patients with IRP with and without recurrence at time of enrollment. The study consisted of 4 periods: screening, run-in (open-label treatment period), randomized withdrawal, and follow-up. Patients with clinical response to goflikicept in the run-in period were randomized (1:1) to a placebo-controlled withdrawal period, where the time to first pericarditis recurrence (primary endpoint) was evaluated. RESULTS We enrolled 22 patients, and 20 of these patients were randomized. Reduction of C-reactive protein level accompanied by reduction of chest pain and pericardial effusion compared to baseline was demonstrated during the run-in period. Recurrence of pericarditis occurred in 9 of 10 patients in the placebo group, and there were no recurrence events in goflikicept group within 24 weeks after randomization (P < 0.001). A total of 122 adverse events were reported in 21 patients (95.5%), with no deaths and no new safety signals identified for goflikicept. CONCLUSIONS Treatment with goflikicept prevented recurrences and maintained IRP remission with a favorable risk-benefit ratio. Goflikicept reduced the risk of recurrence compared with placebo. (Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of RPH-104 Treatment in Patients With Idiopathic Recurrent Pericarditis; NCT04692766).

Expert Takes3 quotes

1/3

“Although the sample size is small and the duration of follow-up is limited, the safety profile for goflikicept was similar to that of prior IL-1 blocker studies.”

Allan L. Klein, Cardiovascular medicine, Cleveland Clinicauto_pipelineCautiousView source
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Myachikova et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Idiopathic recurrent pericarditis (n=22). Goflikicept vs. Placebo was evaluated on time to first pericarditis recurrence (p=<0.001). Goflikicept significantly reduced the risk of pericarditis recurrence compared with placebo during a 24-week withdrawal period (0% vs 90%; P<0.001).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa3956b4e361dc679e2b3b6https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2023.04.046
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper