PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 6, 2018Anaesthesia166 citationsOpen Access

Changes in health‐related quality of life after discharge from an intensive care unit: a systematic review

View Full Paper
AGA. GerthRHRobert Alan HatchDYDuncan Young

Key Result

Across 48 studies, quality of life after critical care was worse than for age- and sex-matched populations, though it improved for one year after hospital discharge.

Study Design

Type

Systematic Review

Structured PICO

P
Population
Systematic review of 48 studies assessing health-related quality of life in patients discharged from intensive care.
C
Comparator
Age- and sex-matched populations (population norms)
O
Outcome
Health-related quality of life measured at any time after hospital discharge using validated measures (e.g., SF-36, EQ-5D)patient reported

Quality of life after critical care is significantly worse than population norms but improves over the first year post-discharge, particularly in physical and social domains.

Abstract

Quality of life after critical illness is becoming increasingly important as survival improves. Various measures have been used to study the quality of life of patients discharged from intensive care. We systematically reviewed validated measures of quality of life and their results. We searched PubMed, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Web of Science and Open Grey for studies of quality of life, measured after discharge from intensive care. We categorised studied populations as: general; restricted to level-3 care or critical care beyond 5 days; and septic patients. We included quality of life measured at any time after hospital discharge. We identified 48 studies. Thirty-one studies used the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and 19 used the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D); eight used both and nine used alternative validated measures. Follow-up rates ranged from 26-100%. Quality of life after critical care was worse than for age- and sex-matched populations. Quality of life improved for one year after hospital discharge. The aspects of life that improved most were physical function, physical role, vitality and social function. However, these domains were also the least likely to recover to population norms as they were more profoundly affected by critical illness.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gerth et al. (2018) conducted a systematic review in Critical illness. Critical illness vs. Age- and sex-matched populations was evaluated on Quality of life. Across 48 studies, quality of life after critical care was worse than for age- and sex-matched populations, though it improved for one year after hospital discharge.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa4a04810877e4fda94e1d8https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14444
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Survival and quality of life 12 years after ICU. A comparison with the general Norwegian population2001 · 114 citations
  2. 2The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses2014 · 17,884 citations
  3. 3The Impact of Medical Conditions on the Quality of Life of Survivors at Discharge From Intensive Care Unit2011 · 3 citations
  4. 4ICU survivors show no decline in health-related quality of life after 5 years2015 · 46 citations
  5. 5Mortality and quality of life in the five years after severe sepsis2013 · 217 citations