PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 1993Spine157 citations

Evaluation of Intraoperative Somatosensory-Evoked Potential Monitoring During 100 Cervical Operations

View Full Paper
NENancy E. EpsteinJDJoseph DantoDNDominic J. Nardi

Key Result

Continuous intraoperative somatosensory-evoked potential monitoring during cervical surgery was associated with 0% quadriplegia and 0% mortality, compared to 3.7% and 0.5% in unmonitored patients.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=318)

Structured PICO

Does continuous intraoperative somatosensory-evoked potential monitoring reduce morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing cervical surgery?

P
Population
318 patients undergoing cervical surgery for disc disease, stenosis, spondylosis, or ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, comparing monitored vs unmonitored procedures.
E
Exposure
Continuous intraoperative somatosensory-evoked potential monitoring
C
Comparator
No monitoring (historical cohort operated on between 1985-1989)
O
Outcome
Morbidity (quadriplegia) and mortality rateshard clinical

Continuous intraoperative somatosensory-evoked potential monitoring during cervical surgery is associated with a reduction in severe neurologic deficits and mortality.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 3.7%

Abstract

Continuous intraoperative somatosensory-evoked potential monitoring during scoliosis surgery, along with improved instrumentation techniques, has contributed to the reduction of neurologic injury from 4-6.9% to 0-0.7%. To assess whether somatosensory-evoked potential monitoring might play a similar role in cervical surgery, the authors compared the morbidity and mortality rates associated with 218 patients who were not monitored and were operated on between 1985-1989 with those found in 100 consecutive somatosensory-evoked potential monitored procedures done from 1989-1991. The cervical procedures were conducted for disc disease, stenosis, spondylosis, and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Eight of 218 unmonitored patients became quadriplegic (3.7%) and 1 died (0.5%); no instances of quadriplegia and no deaths were encountered among the 100 monitored patients. The reduction of neurologic deficit was attributed in part to early somatosensory-evoked potential detection of vascular or mechanical compromise of the spinal cord or nerve roots and to the immediate alteration of anesthetic or surgical technique in response to somatosensory-evoked potential changes, i.e., reversal of systemic or "relative" hypotension, adjustment of operative position, release of distraction, and cessation of manipulation. Continuous intraoperative somatosensory-evoked potential monitoring also was a practical tool in monitoring cervical surgery.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Epstein et al. (1993) conducted a cohort in Cervical surgery (disc disease, stenosis, spondylosis, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament) (n=318). Continuous intraoperative somatosensory-evoked potential monitoring vs. No monitoring was evaluated on Quadriplegia. Continuous intraoperative somatosensory-evoked potential monitoring during cervical surgery was associated with 0% quadriplegia and 0% mortality, compared to 3.7% and 0.5% in unmonitored patients.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa4f034ac77d5296f2bd1c7https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199305000-00011
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper