PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 19, 2020Heart Rhythm305 citationsOpen Access

2020 APHRS/HRS expert consensus statement on the investigation of decedents with sudden unexplained death and patients with sudden cardiac arrest, and of their families

MSMartin K. StilesAWArthur A.M. WildeDADominic J. Abrams

Key Result

This expert consensus statement provides evidence-based recommendations for the multidisciplinary evaluation of patients with sudden cardiac arrest, decedents with sudden unexplained death, and their families.

Structured PICO

P
Population
Patients and decedents with (aborted) sudden cardiac arrest and their families
I
Intervention
Multidisciplinary investigation and evaluation framework

This consensus statement provides a framework for the multidisciplinary investigation and counseling of patients with sudden cardiac arrest, decedents with sudden unexplained death, and their families.

Limitations

  • Not all resources will be available to all clinicians.

Abstract

This international multidisciplinary document intends to provide clinicians with evidence-based practical patient-centered recommendations for evaluating patients and decedents with (aborted) sudden cardiac arrest and their families. The document includes a framework for the investigation of the family allowing steps to be taken, should an inherited condition be found, to minimize further events in affected relatives. Integral to the process is counseling of the patients and families, not only because of the emotionally charged subject, but because finding (or not finding) the cause of the arrest may influence management of family members. The formation of multidisciplinary teams is essential to provide a complete service to the patients and their families, and the varied expertise of the writing committee was formulated to reflect this need. The document sections were divided up and drafted by the writing committee members according to their expertise. The recommendations represent the consensus opinion of the entire writing committee, graded by Class of Recommendation and Level of Evidence. The recommendations were opened for public comment and reviewed by the relevant scientific and clinical document committees of the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS) and the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS); the document underwent external review and endorsement by the partner and collaborating societies. While the recommendations are for optimal care, it is recognized that not all resources will be available to all clinicians. Nevertheless, this document articulates the evaluation that the clinician should aspire to provide for patients with sudden cardiac arrest, decedents with sudden unexplained death, and their families.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Stiles et al. (2020) conducted a review in Sudden cardiac arrest and sudden unexplained death. Expert consensus recommendations was evaluated. This expert consensus statement provides evidence-based recommendations for the multidisciplinary evaluation of patients with sudden cardiac arrest, decedents with sudden unexplained death, and their families.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa5bd74041e43fea73a60e3https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.10.010
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Molecular autopsy in sudden cardiac death and its implication for families: discussion of the practical, legal and ethical aspects of the multidisciplinary collaboration2009 · 42 citations
  2. 22015 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death2015 · 3,927 citations
  3. 3Natural and Undetermined Sudden Death: Value of Post-Mortem Genetic Investigation2016 · 92 citations
  4. 4Genetic Testing for Long-QT Syndrome2009 · 354 citations
  5. 5Returning Results to Family Members: Professional Duties in Genomics Research in the United States2018 · 11 citations