PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 4, 2025European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery2 citationsOpen Access

Editor's Choice – Permanent Dialysis following Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

View Full Paper
JTJoshua TsaiECE CharlesMNMaria Nicola

Key Result

Suprarenal fixation EVAR was associated with an increased risk of permanent dialysis compared with infrarenal fixation EVAR (0.70% vs 0.12%; OR 2.38, 95% CI 1.19-4.78).

Study Design

Type

Meta-Analysis (n=72,803)

Structured PICO

Does suprarenal manipulation compared to infrarenal repair increase the risk of permanent dialysis in patients undergoing elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair?

P
Population
72,803 abdominal aortic aneurysms undergoing primary elective repair across 56 studies to assess the risk of post-operative permanent dialysis.
I
Intervention
Suprarenal manipulation (suprarenal fixation endovascular aortic repair [EVAR] or suprarenal open aortic repair)
C
Comparator
Infrarenal repair (infrarenal fixation EVAR or infrarenal open aortic repair)
O
Outcome
Post-operative permanent dialysishard clinical

Suprarenal manipulation during elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair is associated with a significantly increased risk of post-operative permanent dialysis compared to infrarenal repair, though absolute rates remain low.

Main Result

Odds Ratio: 2.38 (95% CI 1.19–4.78)

Absolute Event Rate: 0.7% vs 0.12%

Limitations

  • GRADE criteria confidence for all estimates were low or very low.
  • GRADE criteria confidence for all estimates were low or very low

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the risk of permanent renal dialysis following abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair, comparing suprarenal and infrarenal, and open and endovascular aortic repairs (EVAR). DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL searches, including primary elective AAA repair for minimum 100 patients, published from 2010. REVIEW METHODS: Systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of post-operative permanent dialysis following PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD42021272422). RESULTS: Fifty-six studies, 72 803 AAAs: 57 708 infrarenal EVARs, (1 738 infrarenal fixation and 2 963 suprarenal fixation EVARs,) 1 159 complex EVARs, 9 108 infrarenal and 4 828 suprarenal open repairs. Low rates of permanent dialysis were reported: 0.42% (95%CI 0.22-0.62%) infrarenal EVAR, (0.12% 0-0.37% infrarenal fixation, 0.70% 0.25-1.14% suprarenal fixation,) 1.61% (0.65-2.57%) complex EVAR, 0.28% (0.03-0.53%) infrarenal open and 0.98% (0.49-1.46%)] suprarenal open aortic repair. No significant difference in permanent dialysis between open repair and EVAR was observed for infrarenal or suprarenal repairs. Increased risk was observed for suprarenal fixation compared with infrarenal fixation EVAR (odds ratio 2.38 1.19-4.78) and suprarenal compared with infrarenal open aortic repair (odds ratio 3.29 2.07-5.25). Increasing patient age, female sex, and greater contrast dose were associated with permanent dialysis. GRADE criteria confidence for all estimates were low or very low. CONCLUSION: Rates of permanent dialysis were generally <1% for infrarenal AAA repair. Surgeons should advise patients undergoing suprarenal manipulation (suprarenal fixation or clamping) of enhanced risk.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tsai et al. (2025) conducted a meta-analysis in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) (n=72,803). Suprarenal fixation EVAR vs. Infrarenal fixation EVAR was evaluated on permanent renal dialysis (OR 2.38, 95% CI 1.19-4.78). Suprarenal fixation EVAR was associated with an increased risk of permanent dialysis compared with infrarenal fixation EVAR (0.70% vs 0.12%; OR 2.38, 95% CI 1.19-4.78).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa74455988cce70a1e57edahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2025.10.031
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper