PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 31, 1991Journal of the American Planning Association382 citations

The Commuting Paradox Evidence from the Top Twenty

View Full Paper
PGPeter GordonHRHarry W. RichardsonMJMyung‐Jin Jun

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract A comparison of auto commuting trip durations from the 1985 American Housing Survey to data from the 1980 census for the twenty largest metropolitan areas suggests that during the study period average trip times either fell by a statistically significant amount or remained the same. A paradox may exist in the widespread reports of congestion in spite of stable average trip durations. Perhaps average commute times are contained by the location adjustments that households and businesses make. Perhaps there is no paradox. Location adjustments would not be made were it not for the perception of congestion.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gordon et al. (1991) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1c138c0a1f7575939d7978https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369108975516
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Congestion, Changing Metropolitan Structure, and City Size in the United States1989 · 142 citations
  2. 2Roadway congestion in major urban areas 1982 to 19871989 · 34 citations
  3. 3Beyond the journey to work1988 · 87 citations
  4. 4Peak-spreading: How much?1990 · 17 citations
  5. 5Gender Differences in Metropolitan Travel Behaviour1989 · 240 citations