Heart Failure / Cardiomyopathy · University of Copenhagen
“
The findings of POTCAST lead us to speculate that increased potassium levels may, at least partially, be responsible for MRAs' positive outcomes, rather than merely being a side effect. We believe the time is right to consider increasing potassium levels to the mid-to-high normal range as an inexpensive and widely available treatment strategy in patients with a broad spectrum of cardiovascular diseases associated with a high risk of ventricular arrhythmia.
Potassium-Increasing Regimens in Patients at High Risk of Ventricular Arrhythmias: A Prespecified Observational Analysis of the Randomized POTCAST Trial
EP Europace · Danielsen et al. ·
ACC Journal Scan
“
These studies have shown excellent and similar or even better responses with CSP-CRT compared to BiV-CRT and comparing our results to some of the latest European studies (CSP-Sync and Left Bundle CRT) the improvements in the patients randomized to CSP-CRT were almost identical regarding LVEF and...
Direct His/LBB Pacing as an Alternative to Biventricular Pacing in Patients With HFrEF and a Typical LBBB
JACC. Clinical electrophysiology · Vinther et al. ·
Dr. Henning Bundgaard
Heart Failure / Cardiomyopathy · University of Copenhagen
“
The findings of POTCAST lead us to speculate that increased potassium levels may, at least partially, be responsible for MRAs' positive outcomes, rather than merely being a side effect. We believe the time is right to consider increasing potassium levels to the mid-to-high normal range as an inexpensive and widely available treatment strategy in patients with a broad spectrum of cardiovascular diseases associated with a high risk of ventricular arrhythmia.
Increasing plasma potassium and risk of atrial fibrillation: the POTCAST trial
European Heart Journal · Zheng et al. ·
TCTMD
“
We now have randomized data showing that [LBBAP] is a very credible CRT option, with procedural advantages in some settings and clinical outcomes that are at least broadly comparable to BiV-CRT in selected populations.
His Pacing vs Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
JACC. Clinical electrophysiology · Frandsen et al. ·
Randomized trial reduced ventricular arrhythmia events in patients with cardiovascular disease, indicating potassium supplementation may be beneficial.
Randomized trial reduced ventricular arrhythmia events in patients with cardiovascular disease, indicating potassium supplementation may be beneficial.
Cross-Sectional Study
JUL 2025DinesenEuropean Heart Journal - Imaging Methods and Practice
OBJECTIVE: Hypokalemia is associated with increased risk of arrhythmias and it is recommended to monitor plasma potassium (p-K) regularly in at-risk patients with cardiovascular diseases. It is poorly understood if administration of potassium supplements and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) aimed at increasing p-K also increases intracellular potassium. METHODS: Adults aged≥18 years with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) were randomized (1:1) to a control group or to an intervention that included guidance on potassium rich diets, potassium supplements, and MRA to increase p-K to target levels of 4.5-5.0 mmol/l for six months. Total-body-potassium (TBK) was measured by a Whole-Body-Counter along with p-K at baseline, after six weeks, and after six months. RESULTS: Fourteen patients (mean age: 59 years (standard deviation 14), 79% men) were included. Mean p-K was 3.8 mmol/l (0.2), and mean TBK was 1.50 g/kg (0.20) at baseline. After six-weeks, p-K had increased by 0.47 mmol/l (95%CI:0.14;0.81), p = 0.008 in the intervention group compared to controls, whereas no significant difference was found in TBK (44 mg/kg (-20;108), p = 0.17). After six-months, no significant difference was found in p-K as compared to baseline (0.16 mmol/l (-0.18;0.51), p = 0.36), but a significant increase in TBK of 82 mg/kg (16;148), p = 0.017 was found in the intervention group compared to controls. CONCLUSIONS: Increased potassium intake and MRAs increased TBK gradually and a significant increase was seen after six months. The differentially regulated p-K and TBK challenges current knowledge on potassium homeostasis and the time required before the full potential of p-K increasing treatment can be anticipated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03833089).
OBJECTIVE: Hypokalemia is associated with increased risk of arrhythmias and it is recommended to monitor plasma potassium (p-K) regularly in at-risk patients with cardiovascular diseases. It is poorly understood if administration of potassium supplements and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) aimed at increasing p-K also increases intracellular potassium. METHODS: Adults aged≥18 years with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) were randomized (1:1) to a control group or to an intervention that included guidance on potassium rich diets, potassium supplements, and MRA to increase p-K to target levels of 4.5-5.0 mmol/l for six months. Total-body-potassium (TBK) was measured by a Whole-Body-Counter along with p-K at baseline, after six weeks, and after six months. RESULTS: Fourteen patients (mean age: 59 years (standard deviation 14), 79% men) were included. Mean p-K was 3.8 mmol/l (0.2), and mean TBK was 1.50 g/kg (0.20) at baseline. After six-weeks, p-K had increased by 0.47 mmol/l (95%CI:0.14;0.81), p = 0.008 in the intervention group compared to controls, whereas no significant difference was found in TBK (44 mg/kg (-20;108), p = 0.17). After six-months, no significant difference was found in p-K as compared to baseline (0.16 mmol/l (-0.18;0.51), p = 0.36), but a significant increase in TBK of 82 mg/kg (16;148), p = 0.017 was found in the intervention group compared to controls. CONCLUSIONS: Increased potassium intake and MRAs increased TBK gradually and a significant increase was seen after six months. The differentially regulated p-K and TBK challenges current knowledge on potassium homeostasis and the time required before the full potential of p-K increasing treatment can be anticipated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03833089).
BACKGROUND: Observational evidence suggests that mask wearing mitigates transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). It is uncertain if this observed association arises through protection of uninfected wearers (protective effect), via reduced transmission from infected mask wearers (source control), or both. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether recommending surgical mask use outside the home reduces wearers' risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection in a setting where masks were uncommon and not among recommended public health measures. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial (DANMASK-19 [Danish Study to Assess Face Masks for the Protection Against COVID-19 Infection]). (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04337541). SETTING: Denmark, April and May 2020. PARTICIPANTS: Adults spending more than 3 hours per day outside the home without occupational mask use. INTERVENTION: Encouragement to follow social distancing measures for coronavirus disease 2019, plus either no mask recommendation or a recommendation to wear a mask when outside the home among other persons together with a supply of 50 surgical masks and instructions for proper use. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was SARS-CoV-2 infection in the mask wearer at 1 month by antibody testing, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), or hospital diagnosis. The secondary outcome was PCR positivity for other respiratory viruses. Multiple imputation accounting for loss to follow-up yielded similar results. Although the difference observed was not statistically significant, the 95% CIs are compatible with a 46% reduction to a 23% increase in infection. LIMITATION: Inconclusive results, missing data, variable adherence, patient-reported findings on home tests, no blinding, and no assessment of whether masks could decrease disease transmission from mask wearers to others. CONCLUSION: The recommendation to wear surgical masks to supplement other public health measures did not reduce the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate among wearers by more than 50% in a community with modest infection rates, some degree of social distancing, and uncommon general mask use. The data were compatible with lesser degrees of self-protection. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: The Salling Foundations.
BACKGROUND: Observational evidence suggests that mask wearing mitigates transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). It is uncertain if this observed association arises through protection of uninfected wearers (protective effect), via reduced transmission from infected mask wearers (source control), or both. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether recommending surgical mask use outside the home reduces wearers' risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection in a setting where masks were uncommon and not among recommended public health measures. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial (DANMASK-19 [Danish Study to Assess Face Masks for the Protection Against COVID-19 Infection]). (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04337541). SETTING: Denmark, April and May 2020. PARTICIPANTS: Adults spending more than 3 hours per day outside the home without occupational mask use. INTERVENTION: Encouragement to follow social distancing measures for coronavirus disease 2019, plus either no mask recommendation or a recommendation to wear a mask when outside the home among other persons together with a supply of 50 surgical masks and instructions for proper use. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was SARS-CoV-2 infection in the mask wearer at 1 month by antibody testing, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), or hospital diagnosis. The secondary outcome was PCR positivity for other respiratory viruses. Multiple imputation accounting for loss to follow-up yielded similar results. Although the difference observed was not statistically significant, the 95% CIs are compatible with a 46% reduction to a 23% increase in infection. LIMITATION: Inconclusive results, missing data, variable adherence, patient-reported findings on home tests, no blinding, and no assessment of whether masks could decrease disease transmission from mask wearers to others. CONCLUSION: The recommendation to wear surgical masks to supplement other public health measures did not reduce the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate among wearers by more than 50% in a community with modest infection rates, some degree of social distancing, and uncommon general mask use. The data were compatible with lesser degrees of self-protection. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: The Salling Foundations.
High plasma 25‐hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentration has been associated observationally with a high risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC), whereas many studies suggest that vitamin D could have a protective effect against cancer. The true association between vitamin D and risk of skin cancer remains unclear. To test the hypothesis that genetically high plasma 25(OH)D protects against NMSC. We included 103 084 individuals from the Danish general population, of whom 35 298 had plasma 25(OH)D measured and 97 849 were genotyped for four genetic variants near DHCR7 and CYP2R1 associated with 25(OH)D concentrations. We tested the association between plasma 25(OH)D levels and NMSC observationally and between genetically determined 25(OH)D levels and NMSC, using an instrumental variable approach. Multivariate‐adjusted hazard ratios of NMSC were 3·27 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2·22–4·84] for plasma 25(OH)D ≥ 50 nmol L−1 vs. < 25 nmol L−1. Genetic variants around DHCR7 and CYP2R1 were associated with up to 8·2 nmol L−1 higher 25(OH)D concentrations (F = 314). The odds ratio (OR) for a genetically determined 20 nmol L−1 higher plasma 25(OH)D was 1·11 (95% CI 0·91–1·35) for NMSC, with a corresponding observational multivariable adjusted OR of 1·13 (95% CI 1·10–1·17). Genetically determined high 25(OH)D levels did not appear to protect against NMSC, whereas high plasma 25(OH)D concentrations were associated with an observational high risk of NMSC. Thus, the observational association likely reflects confounding by sun exposure rather than causality.
High plasma 25‐hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentration has been associated observationally with a high risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC), whereas many studies suggest that vitamin D could have a protective effect against cancer. The true association between vitamin D and risk of skin cancer remains unclear. To test the hypothesis that genetically high plasma 25(OH)D protects against NMSC. We included 103 084 individuals from the Danish general population, of whom 35 298 had plasma 25(OH)D measured and 97 849 were genotyped for four genetic variants near DHCR7 and CYP2R1 associated with 25(OH)D concentrations. We tested the association between plasma 25(OH)D levels and NMSC observationally and between genetically determined 25(OH)D levels and NMSC, using an instrumental variable approach. Multivariate‐adjusted hazard ratios of NMSC were 3·27 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2·22–4·84] for plasma 25(OH)D ≥ 50 nmol L−1 vs. < 25 nmol L−1. Genetic variants around DHCR7 and CYP2R1 were associated with up to 8·2 nmol L−1 higher 25(OH)D concentrations (F = 314). The odds ratio (OR) for a genetically determined 20 nmol L−1 higher plasma 25(OH)D was 1·11 (95% CI 0·91–1·35) for NMSC, with a corresponding observational multivariable adjusted OR of 1·13 (95% CI 1·10–1·17). Genetically determined high 25(OH)D levels did not appear to protect against NMSC, whereas high plasma 25(OH)D concentrations were associated with an observational high risk of NMSC. Thus, the observational association likely reflects confounding by sun exposure rather than causality.
Mendelian Randomization
MAR 2015WinsløwInternational Journal of Epidemiology
BACKGROUND: Conflicting evidence has been found regarding the association between high tobacco consumption and body weight among smokers. We tested the hypothesis that high tobacco consumption is causally associated with low body weight. METHODS: We conducted a Mendelian randomization study with a genetic variant in CHRNA3 (rs1051730) as proxy for high tobacco consumption. The cohort consisted of 80,342 participants from the Copenhagen General Population Study, with details on body weight, smoking habits and CHRNA3 genotype, including 15,220 current smokers. RESULTS: In observational analyses, high tobacco consumption was associated with high body weight, body mass index, waist circumference, hip circumference and waist-hip ratio. In multivariable adjusted models a 1-cigarette/day higher tobacco consumption was associated with 0.05 kg (95% confidence interval 0.02; 0.08) higher body weight, 0.02 kg/m(2) (0.01; 0.02) higher body mass index, 0.10 cm (0.07; 0.12) higher waist circumference and 0.02 cm (0.001; 0.03) higher hip circumference. In contrast, the per-allele increase inCHRNA3 rs1051730 associated with high tobacco consumption was associated with 0.59 kg (0.96; 0.22) lower body weight, 0.23 kg/m(2) (0.33; 0.13) lower body mass index, 0.32 cm (0.74; 0.003) lower waist circumference and 0.45 cm (0.66; 0.24) lower hip circumference. No association was found between tobacco consumption and waist-hip ratio in genetic analysis, or among CHRNA3 genotype and any of the outcome variables in former or never smokers. CONCLUSIONS: High tobacco consumption causes lower body weight among current smokers. However, smoking does not seem to affect body shape or fat distribution causally. The lack of association between CHRNA3 genotype and body weight among former smokers and never smokers favours smoking as the causal factor for the observed associations.
BACKGROUND: Conflicting evidence has been found regarding the association between high tobacco consumption and body weight among smokers. We tested the hypothesis that high tobacco consumption is causally associated with low body weight. METHODS: We conducted a Mendelian randomization study with a genetic variant in CHRNA3 (rs1051730) as proxy for high tobacco consumption. The cohort consisted of 80,342 participants from the Copenhagen General Population Study, with details on body weight, smoking habits and CHRNA3 genotype, including 15,220 current smokers. RESULTS: In observational analyses, high tobacco consumption was associated with high body weight, body mass index, waist circumference, hip circumference and waist-hip ratio. In multivariable adjusted models a 1-cigarette/day higher tobacco consumption was associated with 0.05 kg (95% confidence interval 0.02; 0.08) higher body weight, 0.02 kg/m(2) (0.01; 0.02) higher body mass index, 0.10 cm (0.07; 0.12) higher waist circumference and 0.02 cm (0.001; 0.03) higher hip circumference. In contrast, the per-allele increase inCHRNA3 rs1051730 associated with high tobacco consumption was associated with 0.59 kg (0.96; 0.22) lower body weight, 0.23 kg/m(2) (0.33; 0.13) lower body mass index, 0.32 cm (0.74; 0.003) lower waist circumference and 0.45 cm (0.66; 0.24) lower hip circumference. No association was found between tobacco consumption and waist-hip ratio in genetic analysis, or among CHRNA3 genotype and any of the outcome variables in former or never smokers. CONCLUSIONS: High tobacco consumption causes lower body weight among current smokers. However, smoking does not seem to affect body shape or fat distribution causally. The lack of association between CHRNA3 genotype and body weight among former smokers and never smokers favours smoking as the causal factor for the observed associations.
