July 28, 2025Open Access

Artificially induced altitudes aerobic and anaerobic performance differences on double-poling ergometer in elite young cross-country skiers

PBPeter BartíkPrince Sultan University JSJiří SuchýCharles University LPLadislav PyšnýJan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem

Key Points

Elite young cross-country skiers show increased heart rate during aerobic and anaerobic exercises at high altitude.
Average heart rate values at high altitude are 3-5% higher than at low altitude, with statistical significance (p<0.05).
Lactate concentration changes were not statistically significant, indicating heart rate as a better performance measure for altitude effects.
Monitoring heart rate is crucial for assessing altitude impacts, suggesting it may be more reliable than lactate concentration.

Abstract

Background The key factors for cross-country skier training are high-altitude acclimatization and strength in double-polling. This study aimed to identify the effects of artificially induced high altitude on acute performance changes during aerobic (AE) and anaerobic (ANE) threshold exercises. Sport-specific tests simulating double-poling cross-country skiing were performed. Methods Eleven (8 ♂ and 3 ♀) highly trained cross-country skiers (age 19±2.81, BMI 21.9±2.1) performed a stress test to determine individual AE and ANE levels and AE and ANE intensity tests at low (500m ASL) and artificially induced high (2000m ASL) altitudes. The altitude was simulated using the hypoxic generator HYP-100™. For double-poling, the ergometer SkiErg® was used in the standing position. Heart rate (HR) and lactate concentration (LC) in the capillary blood were monitored. Results For the AE and ANE loads, the average HR values at an artificially induced high altitude were 3–5% higher than those at a low altitude. The differences were significant, both statistically (p0.05) nor substantively significant. Conclusions Not-adapted youth elite cross-country skiers have higher HR at artificially induced high altitudes than for the same load in lowlands. The absence of alterations in the average LC confirms that it is more appropriate to monitor the HR for altitude acute effect assessment and employ LC only for verification.

KI fragen

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bartík et al. (Mon,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/689a093fe6551bb0af8ceb03 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.166884.1

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

KI fragen

Bookmark

View Full Paper