On Ælfric and Old English Metrical Theory

Key Points

Ælfric's rhythmical style is better understood as prose rather than traditional verse, and this challenges Bredehoft's assertions.
The analysis highlights a critical defense against Bredehoft's claims, emphasizing the importance of traditional old english metrical theory.
Through examining ælfric's works, it becomes evident that he perceived his compositions in a unique metrical light and not merely as verse.
This discussion concludes by appreciating Bredehoft's scholarship on laȝamon's Brut, promoting a positive dialogue in old english studies.

Abstract

In 2016, Thomas A. Bredehoft wrote a reply to my criticism of his theory of Old English metre, according to which Ælfric's rhythmical compositions ought to be considered verse rather than prose. Here, I provide an answer to some of the points and some of the objections raised in his 2016 essay. I conclude that Bredehoft's criticism of traditional Old English metrical theory is unwarranted, and that Ælfric appears to have regarded his rhythmical style as a special manner of prose composition. The piece ends in a positive note, commending Bredehoft for his work on Laȝamon's Brut and Chronicle verse.

On Ælfric and Old English Metrical Theory

Key Points

Abstract

Cite This Study