Intra-City Differentiation Patterns and Typological Governance Strategies for Urban Villages in Kunming: Empirical Evidence from 140 Case Studies

Amid China’s push for new urbanization and refined urban governance, urban villages function as key transitional spaces in the process of rural–urban spatial restructuring. Their internal differentiation and typological governance approaches warrant systematic exploration. This study examines 140 urban villages located in the core and peripheral areas of Kunming as empirical cases. By innovatively integrating polycentric urban theory with spatial accessibility theory, we construct a dual-dimensional classification framework. Employing the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), we develop a comprehensive evaluation system encompassing ecological, spatial, social, and economic dimensions. Our findings reveal the following: (1) Urban villages with different levels of accessibility within the same region tend to exhibit broadly similar characteristics across most evaluation dimensions. However, outlier cases demonstrate distinct development trajectories that transcend spatial constraints, driven by unique mechanisms underlying their atypical evolution. (2) Cross-regional comparisons highlight systematic disparities across several dimensions, most notably in ecological quality, spatial efficiency, and economic vitality. Based on spatial differentiation, we propose five governance models tailored to varied urban village types. The proposed typological governance framework provides a replicable methodology for addressing urban-rural transition challenges in diverse contexts. By emphasizing the spatial heterogeneity of informal settlements and advocating for place-specific strategies based on geographic endowments, this model enables policymakers to move beyond one-size-fits-all approaches. For Chinese cities, it offers a systematic toolkit to classify urban villages according to their regional roles and developmental potentials, informing tailored regeneration plans. Globally, the framework’s emphasis on context-sensitive typology and multidimensional evaluation can guide the upgrading of informal settlements in rapidly urbanizing regions, particularly where rural-urban interfaces face similar fragmentation pressures.