The dynamics of self-excited shock train oscillations in a back pressured axisymmetric duct was investigated to deepen the understanding of the isolator/combustor coupling in high-speed propulsion systems. The test article consisted of an internal compression inlet followed by a constant area isolator, both having a circular cross-section. A systematic back pressure variation was implemented by using a combination of aerodynamic and physical blockages at the isolator exit. High bandwidth two-dimensional pressure field imaging was performed at 8\, kHz repetition rate within the isolator for different back pressure settings. The acquisition rate was considerably higher than the dominant frequency of the shock train oscillations across the different back pressure settings. The power spectral density of the pressure fluctuations beneath the leading shock foot exhibited broadband low frequency oscillations across all back pressures that resembled the motions of canonical shock–boundary layer interaction units. A node in the vicinity of reattachment location that originated the pressure perturbations within the separation shock was also identified, which further ascertained that the leading shock low frequency motions were driven by the separation bubble pulsations. Above a threshold back pressure, additional peaks appeared at distinct higher frequencies that resembled the acoustic modes within the duct. However, none of the earlier expressions of the resonance acoustic frequency within a straight duct agreed with the experimentally observed value. Cross-spectral analyses suggested that these modes were caused by the shock interactions with upstream propagating acoustic waves that emanate from the reattachment location, originally proposed for transonic diffusers by Robinet & Casalis (2001) Phys. Fluids 13, 1047–1059. Feedback interactions described using one-dimensional stability analysis of the shock perturbations by obliquely travelling acoustic waves (Robinet & Casalis 2001 Phys. Fluids 13, 1047–1059) made favourable comparisons on the back pressure threshold that emanated the acoustic modes as well as the acoustic mode frequencies.
Leonard et al. (Fri,) studied this question.