Marking techniques are employed to guarantee the identification and traceability of biomedical materials. This study investigated the impact of laser and mechanical marking processes on the tribological performance of ISO 5832-1 austenitic stainless steel (SS), specifically examining corrosion resistance, the coefficient of friction, and wear volume in ball-cratering wear tests. The laser marking was performed using a nanosecond Q-switched Nd:YAG laser. Cytotoxicity tests assessed the biocompatibility of the biomaterial. Non-marked surfaces were also evaluated for comparison. A phosphate-buffered saline solution (PBS) served as both the lubricant and corrosion medium. The surface finishing was analyzed using optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy coupled with a field-emission gun (SEM-FEG), combined with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer. The oxide film was examined through X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Wear tests lasted 10 min, with PBS drops applied every 10 s at 75 rpm; solid balls of AISI 316L stainless steel (SS) and polypropylene (PP), each 1 inch in diameter, were used as counter-bodies. Corrosion resistance was assessed using electrochemical methods. Results showed variations in roughness and microstructure due to laser marking. The tribological behaviour was influenced by the type of marking process, and the wear amount depended on the normal force and ball nature. None of the samples was considered cytotoxic, although laser-marked surfaces exhibited the lowest cellular viability among the tested surfaces and the lowest corrosion resistance.
Pieretti et al. (Wed,) studied this question.