Background/Objectives: Multiple sclerosis (MS) often leads to gait impairments, even in early stages, and can affect autonomy and quality of life. Traditional assessment methods, while widely used, have been criticized because they lack sensitivity to subtle gait changes. This scoping review aims to map the landscape of advanced gait analysis technologies—both wearable and non-wearable—and evaluate their application in detecting, characterizing, and monitoring possible gait dysfunction in individuals with MS. Methods: A systematic search was conducted across PubMed and Scopus databases for peer-reviewed studies published in the last decade. Inclusion criteria focused on original human research using technological tools for gait assessment in individuals with MS. Data from 113 eligible studies were extracted and categorized based on gait parameters, technologies used, study design, and clinical relevance. Results: Findings highlight a growing integration of advanced technologies such as inertial measurement units, 3D motion capture, pressure insoles, and smartphone-based tools. Studies primarily focused on spatiotemporal parameters, joint kinematics, gait variability, and coordination, with many reporting strong correlations to MS subtype, disability level, fatigue, fall risk, and cognitive load. Real-world and dual-task assessments emerged as key methodologies for detecting subtle motor and cognitive-motor impairments. Digital gait biomarkers, such as stride regularity, asymmetry, and dynamic stability demonstrated high potential for early detection and monitoring. Conclusions: Advanced gait analysis technologies can provide a multidimensional, sensitive, and ecologically valid approach to evaluating and detecting motor function in MS. Their clinical integration supports personalized rehabilitation, early diagnosis, and long-term disease monitoring. Future research should focus on standardizing metrics, validating digital biomarkers, and leveraging AI-driven analytics for real-time, patient-centered care.
Tsiakiri et al. (Tue,) studied this question.