ABSTRACT This article explores the role of imagination in critical theory, addressing its conceptual ambiguity and its synthesis of three distinct but interrelated strands. The first, rooted in Freud's theory, sees imagination as wish‐fulfillment—necessarily unreal yet foundational to utopian thought. The second strand addresses the ideological corruption of imagination, a concern central to early critical theory's sociological inquiries. The third draws from Kant's influential view of imagination as a mediator between sensibility and understanding, linking it to aesthetic forms of liberation. The article argues that the ideological erosion of imagination manifests less as its corruption than as a diminishment of imaginative capacity itself, positioning imagination as inherently resilient but weakened under certain social conditions. Section 2 traces this view to Freud's influence and its adoption in Marcuse's early work. Section 3 examines ideological dimensions more closely, using the authoritarian personality as a primary reference. Section 4 discusses the aesthetic imagination as a counterforce that amplifies the capacity for envisioning better futures. In Section 5, the article outlines the strengths of this integrative approach: It brings together diverse conceptual strands and reinterprets ideology as a continuum rather than a strict binary. Yet, a central concern remains—the conception of imagination as inherently incorruptible, grounded in Freud's notion of it as a “nature reserve” within the human psyche, resistant to external reality's pressures. The article concludes by proposing a defense of this position.
Markus Gante (Wed,) studied this question.