Comparison of Impulse Response Generation Methods for a Simple Shoebox-Shaped Room

Simulated room impulse responses (RIRs) are important tools for studying architectural acoustics. Many methods exist to generate RIRs, each with unique properties that need to be considered when choosing an RIR synthesis technique. Despite the variation in synthesis techniques, there is a dearth of comparisons between these techniques. To address this, a comprehensive comparison of four major categories of RIR synthesis techniques was conducted: wave-based methods (hybrid FEM and modal analysis), geometrical acoustics methods (the image source method and ray tracing), delay-network reverberators (SDNs), and statistical methods (Sabine-NED). To compare these techniques, RIRs were recorded in a simple shoebox-shaped racquetball court, and we compared the synthesized RIRs against these recordings. We conducted both objective analyses, such as energy decay curves, normalized echo density, and frequency-dependent decay times, and a perceptual assessment of synthesized RIRs, which consisted of a listening assessment with 29 participants that utilized a MUSHRA comparison methodology. Our results reveal distinct advantages and limitations across synthesis categories. For example, the Sabine-NED technique was indistinguishable from the recorded IR, but it does not scale well with increasing geometric complexity. These findings provide valuable insights for selecting appropriate synthesis techniques for applications in architectural acoustics, immersive audio rendering, and virtual reality environments.