In drought-prone regions without irrigation systems, effective agrotechnologies such as subsoiling are crucial for enhancing soil infiltration and water retention. However, the effects of subsoiling can vary depending on crop type and environmental conditions. Despite previous research, there is limited understanding of the contrasting responses of C3 (sunflower) and C4 (maize) crops to subsoiling under drought stress. This study addresses this knowledge gap by assessing the effectiveness of subsoiling as a drought mitigation practice on Haplic Chernozem in Northern Bulgaria, integrating ground-based and remote sensing data. Soil physical parameters, leaf area index (LAI), canopy temperature, crop water stress index (CWSI), soil moisture, and yield were evaluated under both conventional tillage and subsoiling for the two crops. A variety of optical and radar descriptive remote sensing products derived from Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 satellite data were calculated for different crop types. Consequently, the use of machine learning, utilizing all the processed remote sensing products, enabled the reasonable prediction of LAI, achieving a coefficient of determination (R2) after a cross-validation greater than 0.42 and demonstrating good agreement with in situ observations. Results revealed differing responses: subsoiling had a positive effect on sunflower, improving LAI, water status, and slightly increasing yield, while it had no positive effect on maize. These findings highlight the importance of crop-specific responses in evaluating subsoiling practices and demonstrate the added value of integrating unmanned aerial systems (UAS) and satellite-based remote sensing data into agricultural drought monitoring.
Kercheva et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: