The central thesis of this paper is that one can be a lawyer, even a good one, without having learned any legal philosophy, but those who are educated in legal-philosophical reflection acquire a valuable asset that can make them better than their colleagues. To support this claim, the first part of the article attempts to define what can be considered legal-philosophical reflection. In this context, three distinct metaphorical perspectives on legal-philosophical reflection are presented, each illustrated through the name of a well-known painting: a bird's-eye view, a deep view, and the anatomy lesson. The central part of the paper analyzes the relevance of each of these perspectives to the legal profession by examining three commonly cited catchphrases associated with it: "two lawyers, three opinions"; "theory is one thing, practice another"; and "lawyers look for loopholes". Following this analysis, the paper concludes that legal-philosophical education most effectively develops argumentative capacity, hones both analytical and critical thinking, and provides great benefit to law graduates in their future professional practice, including their careers as lawyers.
Miodrag A. Jovanović (Wed,) studied this question.