This article explores how European Union migration policies have been fundamentally shaped by neoliberal ideologies prioritizing market efficiency, labor commodification, and privatized border control. Through a critical analysis of key policy instruments, including the Schengen Agreement, Dublin Regulation, Maastricht and Lisbon Treaties, and the New Pact on Migration and Asylum, it examines how neoliberal logics have transformed the EU’s approach to human mobility. The paper highlights a central paradox: while promoting the free movement of labor within the EU, external borders have been increasingly securitized, and access for third-country nationals has been restricted. Schengen’s semi-permeable design has fostered a Fortress Europe mentality, while the Dublin Regulation redistributes responsibility in ways that burden peripheral states. The Maastricht and Lisbon Treaties institutionalized centralized governance, embedding market-driven principles in migration policy. These shifts reinforce inequalities, undermine migrant rights, and create asymmetrical burdens among member states. Ultimately, the article argues for a reimagining of EU migration governance, one that prioritizes human rights, equitable responsibility-sharing, and non-commodified forms of mobility.
Ahmet Küçük (Fri,) studied this question.