Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a multifactorial condition defined as an anatomical prolapse of vaginal walls with the sensation of a vaginal bulge or functional compromise. This study was aimed at estimating the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in women aged 30-65 years and to evaluate the correlation between subjective symptoms, and objective clinical findings of POP. This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Women's Clinic of Tartu University Hospital in 2022-2023 and included 604 women who visited the outpatient department for a cancer screening test. Participants were asked about vaginal bulging sensations and filled out the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20) and the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-7 (PFIQ-7) tools. POP-Q assessment instrument was applied to assess for anatomical prolapse by trained midwives. The prevalence of POP was 9.2% among women at the age of 30-65 years. Anatomical prolapse (POP-Q stage > 1) was observed in 62 women (10%). A total of 257 (42.6%) patients reported feeling a vaginal bulge, including 90 women without anatomical prolapse (POP-Q stage 0) and 111 with mild prolapse (POP-Q stage I). Women without anatomical POP but with a vaginal bulging sensation had higher PDFI-20 and PFIQ-7 scores than those with anatomical POP but no sensation of bulging (p < 0.05). BMI and obstetric factors (e.g., perineal lacerations) were significantly associated with both anatomical POP and the sensation of vaginal bulging (p < 0.05). When managing POP, it is essential to provide comprehensive care that considers both the anatomical and self-reported symptoms of patients.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Iveta Mikeltadze
Tartu University Hospital
Katrin Täär
Tartu University Hospital
Liis Järva
Tartu University Hospital
International Urogynecology Journal
University of Tartu
Tartu University Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mikeltadze et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1bd2a54b1d3bfb60edf46 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06233-8
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: