Examines the complex interaction between the fundamental human right to freedom of movement and the imperatives of national security. By analyzing the evolution of legal doctrine and case law through the lens of both international and national legal frameworks, the paper highlights how states attempt to balance individual liberties with collective security needs. Drawing on the works of Burke-White, Zamir, Bozeman, and others, the study identifies the strategic correlation between human rights protection and national security governance. Particular attention is paid to the European Convention on Human Rights and its jurisprudence, the dilemmas of secrecy and transparency, and the modern challenges posed by terrorism and transnational threats. The article also addresses the role of national human rights institutions in promoting democratic values and good governance. The study concludes that ensuring freedom of movement while safeguarding national security requires flexible legal mechanisms and continuous recalibration of the balance between individual freedoms and state interests in light of new global security challenges.
A. Begembetov (Mon,) studied this question.