Comparative Analysis of Mapping Methods Used in Interior Space Organization and Experience Design

The necessity for new methods to gain insights into architectural interiors and user activity has sparked ongoing debate. Today, the possibilities offered by mapping methodologies serve as a bridge between architectural space and experience design. This research systematically explores the role of mapping methodologies in addressing a wide range of questions regarding the spatial behavior and movement of individuals or groups and how they orient themselves within and experience space. Detailed research of publications from academic databases spanning 1960 to 2024 reveals a lack of guidance in existing literature for practitioners on incorporating mapping methodologies into their design decision-making processes to enhance the organization and experience of interior spaces. The findings underline the advantages and potentials of each method, providing a comprehensive framework to guide practitioners on three categories of mapping methods: human centered, technology-based, and software-based. The study evaluates the advantages and limitations of mapping methodologies used in the past and present, revealing their fundamental contributions to spatial applications. As a result, this study proposes a guiding manual that brings together spatial mapping methodologies in the form of comparative modular information sets, enabling potential researchers/designers/practitioners to integrate the simultaneous use of these methodologies into their decision-making and design processes.