What type of study is this?

This is a Quantitative Study study.

September 17, 2025

Comparing Deep Learning and Patch-based Denoising in the Complex Domain for Diffusion MRI

Key Points

Deep learning denoising in the complex domain achieved the best noise-floor suppression, outperforming patch-based methods.
NORDIC complex denoising provided the highest signal-to-noise ratio gain, indicating effective noise reduction.
The comparative analysis considered metrics like noise variance and signal dynamic range across different denoising approaches.
Findings highlight the potential for the complex domain to enhance denoising benefits more than the specific method used.

Abstract

Motivation: Proprietary denoising methods using deep learning have been recently released for clinical use, but their performance against open source denoising methods in diffusion MRI (dMRI) is unclear. Goal(s): To compare efficacy of GE HealthCare's AIR-ReconDLTM (ARDL) and patch-based MPPCA and NORDIC denoising for reducing noise-induced variance and bias in high-resolution dMRI data. Approach: We compared different denoising approaches, both in complex and magnitude domains, considering metrics reflecting noise variance and noise floor suppression. Results: ARDL denoising, which operates in the complex domain. had the most noise-floor suppression. NORDIC complex denoising had the highest gain in SNR, with comparable, yet improved, signal dynamic range. Impact: Our results suggest that denoising in the complex domain compared to magnitude domain has the potential to lead to larger denoising benefits than any differences induced by the employed denoising approach (e.g. deep learning vs patch-based).

KI fragen

Bookmark