An important aspect of studying the development of agricultural chemicalization in Russia is the retrospective analysis of the key infrastructural components supporting its scientific and technical development, since the widespread application of chemical agents and methods has always depended on the coordinated activities of numerous diverse organizations. ( Research purpose ) To conduct a historical and retrospective analysis of the formation and evolution of the infrastructure supporting agricultural chemicalization in Russia. ( Materials and methods ) Monographs, regulatory documents, and both research and review scientific publications were analyzed using chronological, genetic, and descriptive methods. ( Results and discussion ) The initial infrastructure of agricultural chemicalization in Russia was shaped by higher education institutions, where the scientific foundations of agrochemistry and plant protection were developed. Over time, specialized research institutes were founded further strengthening the scientific base. A major intermediary between science and practice was the Agrochemical Service, created in 1964. Initially organized as a network of control and consulting laboratories, it evolved into a powerful production system by 1979 but was later fragmented due to nationwide disintegration processes. The Soyuzselkhoztehnika system played a pivotal role in supporting and coordinating the agrochemical service network. A unique management model of chemicalization emerged within the Soviet state framework, enabling the systematic infrastructure development. Industry-specific administrative bodies and institutions responsible for science and technology policy functioned both as executors of Party leadership decisions and as their advisors. ( Conclusions ) The coordinated interaction among various infrastructural components of the agricultural chemicalization system facilitated the development of scientific schools, the establishment of a solid theoretical framework, and the creation of significant production capacities. These achievements enabled the Soviet agro-industrial complex to reach impressive results during the Soviet period and laid a strong foundation for its sustainable performance in the following decades.
I. V. Sidorov (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: