The aim of this paper is to argue that Tagorean religious naturalism is the most appropriately formulated doctrine of spiritual naturalism. There are two prongs of attack against religious naturalism. Firstly, religious naturalists adhere to scientism — the view that scientific principles are the authoritative and regulative principles of all disciplines. Secondly, reductive religious naturalism consequently leads to anthropocentrism. The paper will argue that Tagorean religious naturalism does not commit to scientism and anthropocentrism. In addition, it harmonizes spirituality, nature. and humanism. The divinity can be manifested in the natural world and in human creativity. The scientific way of explaining reality is just one way of approaching reality. Terms such as God, self, morality and values have an epistemic significance in the naturalistic explanation of reality.
Manas Kumar Sahu (Thu,) studied this question.