Response to Hurst (Letter to the Editor)

Key Points

The response to Hurst clarifies significant bioethical issues in military medicine, and reinforces the need for interdisciplinary discussions.
Eagan and Marble stress the importance of ethical considerations illustrated in the letter to Hurst, reflecting on military medicine practices.
This engagement exemplifies how bioethics can influence military medical policies and practices, prompting deeper reflection on ethical standards.
The analysis shows the complexity of bioethical paradigms at play, thus emphasizing the relevance of interdisciplinary approaches in military contexts.

Abstract

Journal Article Response to Hurst (Letter to the Editor) Get access Sheena M Eagan, MPH, PhD, Sheena M Eagan, MPH, PhD Department of Bioethics & Interdisciplinary Studies, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27834, United States Corresponding author: Sheena M. Eagan (email protected). https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4843-0803 Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Sanders Marble, PhD Sanders Marble, PhD U.S. Army Medical Department Center of History and Heritage, U.S. Army Medical Center of Excellence, Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234, United States Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Military Medicine, usaf451, https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usaf451 Published: 26 September 2025

Bookmark

Response to Hurst (Letter to the Editor)

Key Points

Abstract

Cite This Study