Effective treatments for recurrent, radiation-relapsed meningiomas (RR-meningiomas) following surgery and radiation therapy (RT) are limited. Inhibitors of the programmed-death-1 (PD-1) or programmed-death ligand-1 (PD-L1) pathway have shown modest activity in single-arm phase II studies of RR-meningiomas. This study aimed to evaluate the immunological effects of combining avelumab, a PD-L1 inhibitory antibody, with proton beam therapy (PBT) in RR-meningiomas. Patients with grade 1-3 RR-meningiomas were treated with neoadjuvant avelumab plus hypofractionated PBT, followed by surgery and adjuvant avelumab. Correlative analyses included RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq), whole exome sequencing (WES), multiplex immunofluorescence (MxIF), single-nucleus RNA-seq (snRNA-seq) of pre- and post-treatment tumor tissues, and flow cytometry (FC) of serial blood samples. Nine patients were enrolled: three achieved an immunologic response and prolonged progression-free survival (PFS > 36 months). At a median follow-up of 47.2 months, the median PFS was 19.1 months (95% CI: 15.2-23.0). RNA-seq showed a dynamic change of tumor microenvironment (TME) signatures. MxIF revealed marked infiltration of T cells and CD68+CD206- (M1-phenotype) macrophages in the post-treatment tissues of responders, a pattern absent in non-responders, whose pre- and post-treatment tissues predominantly featured CD206+ (M2-phenotype) macrophages. These findings were supported by snRNA-seq, which identified FN1-associated immunosuppressive macrophage subtype enriched in non-responders. Additionally, FC revealed elevated peripheral primed T-cell signatures one-month after treatment initiation in responders, suggesting a potential predictive biomarker. Avelumab combined with RT may elicit an immune response in a subset of RR-meningiomas, leading to prolonged remission. Further investigations are warranted to validate these findings and to develop predictive biomarkers in larger prospective studies.
Huang et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: