Background: Three-dimensional (3D) printing has changed healthcare. It allows personalized solutions, moving from mass-produced medical devices to individualized interventions. Its use in dentistry, anesthesiology, and pharmacology tackles issues related to precision, complexity, and patient compliance. This fosters collaboration across disciplines. Aim: This review summarizes evidence on 3D printing applications in dental surgical guides, anatomical anesthesia models, and customized medications. It highlights clinical benefits, challenges, and interdisciplinary connections. Methods: A detailed analysis was conducted, focusing on technological principles, clinical outcomes, and economic impacts. Data were gathered from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Two tables compare printing techniques and clinical outcomes. Results: 3D-printed dental guides achieve 90-95% accuracy and reduce surgery time by 20-30%. Anesthesia models improve simulation accuracy by 25-40% and lower procedural errors. Customized medications increase adherence by 20-30%, while polypills reduce errors from multiple medications. Integration across specialties can reduce errors by 35% in complex cases. Challenges include regulatory obstacles, material stability, and high initial costs. Conclusions: 3D printing connects specialties and improves precision and efficiency in healthcare. Future advancements in AI, bioprinting, and tele-3D printing could lead to wider adoption. However, we need long-term studies and policies focused on equity.
ALOBAID et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: