A perennial question of political thought is how to stabilize a just regime in the face of disagreement. The importance of this question has been heightened with the Weberian state that monopolizes the power of coercion and anchors society under a single governance structure. This political form has given us both liberal democracy and totalitarianism. The stakes could not be higher in ensuring stability without dismantling pluralism. This paper provides a novel solution to the stability problem by focusing on dynamic stability reached through polycentric democracy. Plural and overlapping centers of governance characterize such democracy. This renders a polycentric system more resilient to changing views than a monocentric one and superior on political risk-management grounds by diffusing decision-making risks. A polycentric system also fosters antifragility in society by avoiding seeking a single and fixed point equilibrium, thereby eluding the pitfalls currently afflicting liberal democracy.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Paniagua et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68dd91c7fe798ba2fc4985ef — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14748851251378935
Pablo Paniagua
University of London
Kaveh Pourvand
University of Arizona
European Journal of Political Theory
King's College London
Universidad del Desarrollo
San Sebastián University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...