This study examines the influence of steel fiber reinforcement on the mechanical properties of geopolymer concrete incorporating different slag to fly ash binder ratios (75:25, 50:50, and 25:75). Three fiber contents (0%, 1%, and 2%) by volume were used to assess their impact on compressive strength, flexural strength, initial stiffness, and toughness. Compressive tests were conducted at 1, 7, and 28 days, while flexural behavior was evaluated through a four-point bending test at 28 days. The results showed that geopolymer concrete with 75% slag and 25% fly ash experienced the highest compressive strength and modulus of elasticity, regardless of the steel fiber content. The addition of 1% and 2% steel fiber content enhanced the compressive strength by 17.49% and 28.8%, respectively, compared to the control sample. The binder composition of geopolymer concrete plays a crucial role in determining its compressive strength. Reducing the slag content from 75% to 50% and then to 25% resulted in a 15.1% and 33% decrease in compressive strength, respectively. The load–displacement curves of the 2% fiber-reinforced beams display strain-hardening behavior. On the other hand, after the initial crack, a constant increase in load causes the specimen to experience progressive strain until it reaches its maximum load capacity. When the peak load is attained, the curve gradually drops due to a loss in load-carrying capacity known as post-peak softening. This behavior is attributed to steel’s ductility and is evident in specimens 75S25FA2 and 50S50FA2. Concrete with 75% slag and 25% fly ash demonstrated the highest peak load but the lowest ultimate displacement, indicating high strength but brittle behavior. In contrast, concrete with 75% fly ash and 25% slag showed the lowest peak load but the highest displacement. Across all binder ratios, the addition of steel fibers enhanced the flexural strength, initial stiffness, and toughness. This is attributed to the bridging action of steel fibers in concrete. Additionally, steel fiber-reinforced beams exhibited a ductile failure mode, characterized by multiple fine cracks throughout the midspan, whereas the control beams displayed a single vertical crack in the midspan, indicating a brittle failure mode.
Adam et al. (Wed,) studied this question.