Achilles in Homer's epic 'Iliad' has created a lofty model of ancient Greek heroism. However, its glorious image is accompanied by its chilling cruelty: This kind of sharp opposition and strange coexistence of nobleness and cruelty makes Achilles transcend the thin heroic symbol and become an immortal contradiction full of internal tension. Although the academic community has achieved fruitful results in its dimensions such as heroism, honor concept, god-man relationship, anger theme and tragic fate, the existing research rarely systematically integrates this pair of extreme contradictions in his character, analyzes its psychological and cultural roots, and regards its contradiction as the core artistic means of Homer's ingenuity. In view of this, this paper aims to systematically integrate and deeply explain the dual extremes of Achilles ' character, explore the complex causes of its roots in ancient Greek heroic values, destiny cognition and personal emotional trauma, and reveal the artistic effects achieved by Homer by shaping this extreme contradiction. The following conclusions were drawn through research: Achilles' nobility stems from his individual-oriented consciousness, self-preservation, and the calming down after finding an anchor for his sorrow; his cruelty originates from the stress response of a narcissist being humiliated, the manifestation of his animal nature, and the contradictory psychology of "apologizing with death". Homer's portrayal of such an image aims to break the narrative of war violence, question the meaning of war and heroic ethics, and reveal the identity of human destiny.
Ziyuan Zhao (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: