Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
BACKGROUND Traditional open surgery for displaced scapular body and neck fractures often results in significant trauma and complications. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of a combined medial and lateral minimally invasive approach compared with the traditional Judet approach. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted on 36 patients (22 men, 14 women; mean age 45.6 years) with displaced scapular body and neck fractures treated between May 2016 and May 2022. Nineteen patients underwent the minimally invasive approach, while 17 received the traditional Judet approach. Primary outcomes included surgical incision length, intraoperative blood loss, complication rate, time to postoperative pain relief (VAS score ≤3), and Constant-Murley shoulder score at 12 months. Statistical analysis was done using the t test and chi-square test. RESULTS The minimally invasive group had shorter incision lengths (mean difference: 10.0 cm; 95% CI: 8.1-11.9; P<0.001) and lower blood loss (mean difference: 129.4 mL; 95% CI: 119.0-139.8; P<0.001). They also experienced faster pain relief (mean difference: 3.0 days; 95% CI: 2.5-3.5; P<0.001) and higher Constant-Murley scores (mean difference: 7.4 points; 95% CI: 4.9-9.9; P<0.001). There were no significant differences in operative duration or fracture healing time. CONCLUSIONS The combined medial and lateral minimally invasive approach offers superior outcomes in reducing incision length, blood loss, complications, and pain, with enhanced shoulder function, making it a safe and effective alternative to the traditional Judet approach.
Zhang et al. (Mon,) studied this question.