Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background The Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT) has been implemented in many areas of the UK. It is unclear how ReSPECT is used in primary and community care settings. Aim To understand the extent to which relapse risk and prevention are discussed and managed in general practice. Design and setting A qualitative interview and focus-group study across 13 general practices in three areas of England, between January and December 2022. Method We interviewed GPs, specialist nurses, patients and relatives, and senior care home staff. Focus groups were conducted with community nurses, paramedics, and home care workers. Questions focused on understanding experiences of, and engagement with, ReSPECT. We analysed data using thematic analysis and a coding framework drawn from normalisation process theory. Results Participants included n = 21 GPs, n = 5 specialist nurses, n = 9 patients, n = 7 relatives, n = 31 care home staff, n = 9 community nurses, n = 7 home care workers, and n = 2 paramedics. Participants supported ReSPECT, regarding it as a tool to facilitate person-centred care. GPs faced challenges in timing the introduction of ReSPECT and ensuring sufficient time to complete plans with patients. ReSPECT conversations worked best when there was a trusting relationship between the clinician and the patient (and their family). Anticipating future illness trajectories was difficult, yet plans were rarely reviewed. Interpreting recommendations in emergencies was challenging. Conclusion The ReSPECT process has not translated as well as expected in the community setting. A revised approach is needed to address the challenges of implementation in this context.
Slowther et al. (Fri,) studied this question.