Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Countries have long employed a variety of tools to address artificial arrangements designed to avoid taxation, including specific anti-avoidance rules (SAARs) and general anti-avoidance rules (GAARs). While these might appear to be mutually exclusive, that is not always the case. In the latest Talking Points, Shruti Lohia reviews a case making its way through the Indian courts, which asks whether an arrangement that does not violate a SAAR may still run afoul of that country’s GAAR. So far, the answer is yes.
S Lohia (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: