Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
We have a great capacity to remember a large number of items, yet memory is selective. While multiple factors dictate why we remember some things and not others, it is increasingly acknowledged that some objects are more memorable than others. Recent studies show semantically distinctive objects are better remembered, as are objects located in expected scene contexts. However, we know little about how object semantics and context interact to facilitate memory. Here we test the intriguing hypothesis that these factors have complementary benefits for memory. Participants rated the congruency of object-scene pairs, followed by a surprise memory test. We show that object memory is best predicted by semantic familiarity when an object-scene pairing was congruent, but when object-scene pairings were incongruent, semantic statistics have an especially prominent impact. This demonstrates both the item and its schematic relationship to the environment interact to shape what we will and will not remember.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Pandya et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5920cb6db64358752dc20 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218241283028
Shirley Pandya
University of Miami
Victoria I. Nicholls
Goethe University Frankfurt
Alexandra Krugliak
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
University of Cambridge
Duke University
University of Miami
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: