Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This research presented the results of the process of creation and arrangement of the psychometric characteristics of the Questionnaire for the Evaluation of Digital Learning in Higher Education (QEDLHE). With a quantitative, predominantly instrumental approach, 379 students from different universities in Peru were considered for the validity and reliability stage. The reliability of instruments was assessed using the method of split halves with Pearson and Cronbach's Alpha ratified by the Guttman coefficient; in the exploratory factor analysis, the KMO (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin) contrast and Bartlett's test were used, the rotation method for convergence with Varimax with Kaiser normalization; in the confirmatory factor analysis, the AMOS23 tool was used. Two models were used to compare the best fit indicators as a result. The conclusions show that the instrument has been operationalized theoretically by five dimensions composed of twenty-four items.
Fuster-Guillén et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: