EP51 - Uses of pharmaceutical and mechanical VTE prophylaxis - A clinical audit

Abstract Aim Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious global health care safety concern for both patients and staff. Although it has been amply demonstrated that pharmaceutical and mechanical methods of prophylaxis against VTE are effective, their application has been uneven and insufficient. The purpose of this audit was to assess junior physicians working in general surgery, regarding their adherence to local and NICE guidelines regarding the pharmacological VTE prophylaxis practice as well as the mechanical prophylaxis Methodology Pre-intervention audit took place for two weeks. Throughout the course, it covered every adult general surgical emergency inpatient admission at conquest hospital who were deemed indicated for VTE prophylaxis. Each evening while the patients were still in the hospital, data was collected using the prescription charts, nursing and medical notes. The proforma used for data collection detailed the characteristics of VTE risk, the prophylactic medication prescribed for each patient, TED stockings and whether or not this aligned with the NICE clinical guideline (CG) 46,6.8. Post intervention took place for two weeks after teaching of junior doctors and the same as above was carried out, using the new proforma Results Pre-intervention showed that 87% of patients had the proforma filled in and 100% of patients received the appropriate dose of pharmaceutical prophylaxis. However, less than 40% of patients received the appropriate mechanical prophylaxis. Therefore, intervention was made in the form of a new proforma and teaching to junior. Post intervention data is currently being carried out Conclusion Implementation was necessary to ensure that at-risk patients receive appropriate prophylaxis.