Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Because of their major role in indoor and outdoor air pollution, even at trace levels, VOCs are of great interest, and their monitoring requires sensitive analytical instruments. Several techniques are commonly used, such as portable sensors, Proton Transfer Reaction Mass Spectrometry (PTR-MS) and Thermal Desorption Gas Chromatography (TD-GC). The latter is widely used off- and on-line with Flame Ionization Detectors (FID) or Mass Spectrometers (MS). Given the large number of molecules detected per chromatogram, the data generated by these monitoring techniques are usually checked and reprocessed manually. This process is extremely time consuming and could result in human error. The challenge is to provide reliable results as quickly as possible. In this study, the performances of an on-line TD-GC system with dual detection FID and MS were tested. The Method Detection Limits (MDL), linearities and accuracies of 60 VOCs (alkanes, aromatics, oxygenated and halogenated) were calculated both for FID and MS detectors. The MDLs and accuracies ranged from 0.006 to 0.618 ppbv and from 77 % to 100 % for FID, and from 0.018 to 0.760 ppbv and from 80 % to 100 % for MS. Both detectors showed good complementarity and allowed the development of two programs to facilitate data analysis. These algorithms were designed to autonomously select optimal results between FID and MS detectors, and were evaluated for outdoor and indoor measurement conditions. Measuring VOCs in field campaigns is challenging, and it is anticipated that these programs could be extended to other types of dual-detector systems or for the comparison of data from different calibrated instruments.
Bachelier et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: