Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This multicentre study aimed at assessing multi-vendor accuracy and reproducibility of typical MR biomarkers on 3T and 1.5T scanners from 5 clinical centers. MRI acquisitions were performed using NIST protocols, on Essential System and Diffusion NIST phantoms. T1 was measured by 3-parameter fitting, while T2 and ADC by mono-exponential fitting, using PhantomViewer software. When compared with reference values, non-negligible discrepancies were found across vendors, especially for T1 and T2 measurements. Reproducibility was vendor-dependent, and higher on 3T than on 1.5T scanners. ADC and T1 showed highest reproducibility. Corrections are likely needed to account for possible temperature and scanner differences.
Caroli et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: