Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Due to the easy access, implicit feedback is often used for recommender systems. Compared with point-wise learning and pair-wise learning methods, list-wise rank learning methods have superior performance for top- \(N\) recommendation. Recent solutions, especially the list-wise methods, simply treat all interacted items of a user as equally important positives and annotate all no-interaction items of a user as negatives. For the list-wise approaches, we argue that this annotation scheme of implicit feedback is over-simplified due to the sparsity and missing fine-grained labels of the feedback data. To overcome this issue, we revisit the so-called positive and negative samples. First, considering the loss function of list-wise ranking, we analyze the impact of false positives and negatives theoretically. Second, based on the observation, we propose a self-adjusting credibility weight mechanism to re-weigh the positive samples and exploit the higher-order relation based on item–item matrix to sample the critical negative samples. In order to prevent the introduction of noise, we design a pruning strategy for critical negatives. Besides, to combine the reconstruction loss function for the positive samples and critical negative samples, we develop a simple yet effective VAEs framework with linear structure, which abandons the complex non-linear structure. Extensive experiments are conducted on six public real-world datasets. The results demonstrate that, our VAE* outperforms other VAE-based models by a large margin. Besides, we also verify the effect of denoising positives and exploring critical negatives by ablation study.
Liu et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: