Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Neurodiverse students, encompassing students with ADHD, autism, dyslexia, and other neurological variations, bring a wealth of unique traits and skills such as divergent thinking, creativity, and spatial visualization to advanced study in the fields of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). These traits can not only fuel unconventional problem-solving but also contribute to the richness of cognitive diversity. Despite their potential, navigating the traditional academic landscape at a major R1 university presents unique challenges for these students. While there are many institutional hurdles to optimizing neurodiverse graduate students' experience, a key area of impact lies in the communication dynamics within their advisor-advisee relationships. Drawing from the experiences of current graduate students, this paper explores the opportunities embedded in these relationships to foster a more inclusive and productive academic environment. Through the lens of neurodiverse students' communication, covering spheres of expectations, trust, and feedback, we underscore the power of openness, explicit instruction, and understanding in facilitating the academic journey of neurodiverse students. The strength-based approach illuminates the potential to remove barriers by not merely accommodating but meaningfully harnessing the capabilities of neurodiverse students. The insights may provide a roadmap for advisors and institutions alike, thereby enhancing inclusivity, fostering innovation, and enriching the educational landscape in graduate STEM programs.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Connie Syharat
University of Connecticut
Alexandra Hain
University of Connecticut
Arash E. Zaghi
University of Connecticut
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Syharat et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5d78eb6db64358756e20d — DOI: https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--47523
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: