Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Context Few studies have directly compared the cognitive characteristics of patients with mild autonomous cortisol secretion (MACS) and Cushing’s syndrome (CS). The effect of surgical or conservative treatment on cognitive function in patients with MACS is still unclear. Objective To compare the differences in cognitive function between patients with MACS and CS and evaluate the effect of surgery or conservative treatment on cognitive function. Methods We prospectively recruited 59 patients with nonfunctional adrenal adenoma (NFA), 36 patients with MACS, and 20 patients with adrenal CS who completed the global cognition and cognitive subdomains assessments. Seventeen MACS patients were re-evaluated for cognitive function after a 12-month follow-up period; of these, eleven underwent laparoscopic adrenalectomy and six received conservative treatment. Results Patients with MACS and CS performed worse in the global cognition and multiple cognitive domains than those with NFA (all P0.05). No statistical difference was found in cognitive functions between patients with MACS and CS. Logistic regression analysis showed that patients with MACS (odds ratio OR=3.738, 95% confidence intervals CI: 1.329–10.515, P=0.012) and CS (OR=6.026, 95% CI: 1.411–25.730, P=0.015) were associated with an increased risk of immediate memory impairment. Visuospatial/constructional, immediate and delayed memory scores of MACS patients were significantly improved at 12 months compared with pre-operation in the surgical treatment group (all P0.05), whereas there was no improvement in the conservative treatment group. Conclusion Patients with MACS have comparable cognitive impairment as patients with CS. Cognitive function was partially improved in patients with MACS after adrenalectomy. The current data support the inclusion of cognitive function assessment in the clinical management of patients with MACS.
Liu et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: