Political Legal Dissenting Opinion Ruling in the Dispute Cases on the Results of the 2024 Presidential General Election by Constitutional Judges

The Constitutional Court is a state institution formed after reform. One of the powers of the Constitutional Court is to decide disputes over general election results. Disputes regarding general election results are closely related to political practices or national political conditions. Political conditions will greatly influence the Constitutional Court's decision regarding disputes over general election results. The political configuration resulting from the intersection between law and politics occurred in the Constitutional Court in deciding disputes over general election results. This research uses normative legal research. The approaches taken are a statutory approach and a case approach. Data was collected through library research. In the case of dispute over the results of the 2024 general election, the emergence of dissenting opinions by judges has shown that there are differences in the schools of thought held by constitutional judges. The school of thought held is very closely related to political views. So that PHPU decisions that have a strong political dimension result in the emergence of decisions that have an authoritarian or orthodox character.