Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is the most common sexually transmitted infection worldwide and is a leading cause of oropharyngeal cancer. This study aimed to carry out a KAP survey on HPV infection, HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer and HPV vaccination among dental students. Methods: Through an online self-administered questionnaire, data on dental students' sociodemographic characteristics, knowledge, attitudes and perceptions concerning HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer, infection and vaccination were acquired for a total of 82 questions. Results: A total of 412 dental students completed the questionnaire. The general knowledge rate was 69.5%. In terms of perception, the students provided good insight into their future role in combating HPV disease. Regarding attitudes, most participants felt comfortable talking about HPV topics with patients; however, only approximately 50% of them were inclined to recommend the vaccine regardless of sex. Compared with male and first-year students, female and last-year degree students demonstrated more positive attitudes and perceptions, respectively. Conclusions: This study revealed that dental students have a solid understanding of and positive attitudes toward and perceptions of HPV+ oropharyngeal cancer and its prevention, highlighting their readiness to incorporate HPV prevention into their practice. This emphasizes the key role of the dental profession in addressing oropharyngeal cancer and HPV-related diseases and promoting awareness of the HPV vaccine among the population. Clinical Relevance: By increasing dental students' awareness of HPV, they may be better equipped to educate patients about HPV, promote vaccination, and implement preventative measures. Additionally, the study highlights the need for targeted educational interventions to improve knowledge and attitudes, to enhance the overall public health impact.
Musella et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: