Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
PURPOSE The Hematology-Oncology (HO) fellowship stands as one of the most dynamic specialties within internal medicine. Applicants primarily rely on program websites for information gathering. Our study aims to assess the comprehensiveness of these websites, scrutinizing various categories crucial to applicants. We also evaluate website quality and accessibility of curriculum and recruitment content, identifying areas for enhancement. METHODS Our investigation encompasses 181 ACGME-accredited HO programs across the United States. We analyze data across 10 categories, encompassing program characteristics, faculty, fellows, alumni information, diversity inclusion, curriculum, visa requirements, and website navigation. Websites lacking accessible links are excluded from the search. RESULTS Data from 176 out of 181 programs are collected. 5 programs are excluded due to website unavailability. Across analyzed domains, most programs provide extensive information on training hospitals (88.6%). While 79.5% list current fellows and their educational backgrounds, only 33% mention alumni—a critical aspect for post-fellowship opportunities. Information on rotation sites (75.6%) and curriculum (81.8%) is prevalent. However, details on advanced fellowship programs are sparse, mentioned in only 13.6% of cases. Board pass rates are the least mentioned (1.1%). CONCLUSION Given the burgeoning demand for this specialty, it's imperative to enhance recruitment information on program websites to aid applicants in selecting the best fit. Information gaps persist, particularly regarding available positions and visa sponsorship—vital for applicants. While over half of the websites are easy to navigate, content richness requires further enhancement.
Abbagoni et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: