Trust in the judicial system is an important indicator of the quality of the administration of justice. Kazakhstan's world ranking remains insufficient and needs constant improvement. Kazakhstan is currently working to improve public confidence in the court and the judicial system. Resonant publications in the mass media and social networks also testify to the low trust of society. The reasons for such distrust are internal problems that have acquired a systemic nature. As judicial practice and pre-trial conversations show, there is a common practice in courts among judges, the execution of an oral order by the management of the court or a higher court. Such behavior of judges consists in the presence of administrative levers of pressure on the judge. There are several such levers. The first way to put pressure on a judge is to evaluate his professional activity. If a judge has overturned decisions by higher courts and certain violations of judicial ethics, the Commission on the Quality of the Administration of Justice may make a negative decision. The second method of administrative levers of pressure on the judge is to bring the judge to disciplinary responsibility by reviewing the judge's personal file in the Judicial Jury. If a judge has overturned decisions by higher courts and certain violations of judicial ethics, the Judicial Jury may also make a negative decision. All these levers force the judge to make decisions that are beneficial to the higher court or the leadership of the court, thereby undermining the foundations of justice. To this end, it is important to take a number of important measures. The first of which is the selection of personnel for the judicial system. The second is to eradicate the practice of holding judges accountable for a cancelled or amended decision.
Serik Seitovich Karzhaubaev (Fri,) studied this question.