Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of LX9211 in reducing pain related to diabetic peripheral neuropathy. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS In this double-blind, multicenter, proof-of-concept trial, 319 individuals with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP) were randomized (1:1:1) to LX9211 10 mg (n = 106), LX9211 20 mg (n = 106), or matching placebo (n = 107), administered once daily for 6 weeks. DPNP was rated daily with an 11-point numerical rating scale. The primary end point was change from baseline to week 6 in the average daily pain score. The difference between each LX9211 group and placebo was evaluated with mixed-model repeated-measures analysis. RESULTS For those on low-dose LX9211 the primary efficacy end point was achieved: −1.39 vs. −0.72 points for placebo, least squares mean (SE) difference −0.67 (0.249), 95% CI −1.16 to −0.18, P = 0.007; results for high-dose LX9211 demonstrated improvement in pain severity versus placebo (−1.27 vs. −0.72 points, respectively), but the between-group LS mean difference did not reach the prespecified statistical significance (−0.55 0.254, 95% CI −1.06 to −0.05, P = 0.030). Treatment benefit was observed beginning at week 1 and maintained thereafter. Results for LX9211 also demonstrated improvement in several patient-reported secondary outcomes. Most common adverse events (AEs) were dizziness, nausea, and headache. More participants treated with LX9211 (20 mg, n = 28 26.4%; 10 mg, 17 16.0%) than placebo (3 2.8%) discontinued study drug prematurely due to AEs; serious AEs were uncommon (2 1.9%, 0, and 1 0.9%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS These preliminary findings of improvement in DPNP with LX9211 support further investigation in larger trials.
Pop‐Busui et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: