Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract BACKGROUND Understanding the long-term cognitive sequelae in infant brain tumor survivors remains incomplete, particularly regarding the impact of tumor type, multimodal treatment, and other patient-related factors. This retrospective analysis explores neuropsychological and quality of survival (QoS) outcomes in survivors of atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors (AT/RT) and extracranial malignant rhabdoid tumors of soft tissues (eMRT) and kidneys (RTK), all treated within the same framework. Neuropsychological data from children with AT/RT were compared to data from children with non-irradiated low-grade glioma (LGG). METHODS Patients (0 - 36 months at diagnosis) underwent various treatments, including radio-chemotherapy for AT/RT (n = 13) and eMRT/RTK (n = 7), chemotherapy only for LGG (n = 4) and eMRT/RTK (n = 1), or observation for LGG (n = 11). Neuropsychological evaluations were conducted at a median of 6.8 years (AT/RT), 6.6 years (eMRT/RTK), and 5.2 years (LGG) post-diagnosis. RESULTS Impairments were observed for all tumour types. Patients with AT/RT exhibited impairments in fluid intelligence (p =.041; d = 1.11) and visual processing (p =.001; d = 2.09) when compared to LGG-patients. Both groups demonstrated deficits in psychomotor speed and attention abilities (p .001–.019; d = 0.79–1.90). Diagnosis significantly predicted cognitive outcomes, whereas gender and age-related variables did not. QoS outcomes for all rhabdoid patients indicated lower scores in psychosocial functioning (p =.023; d = 0.78) and quality of life (p =.006; d = 0.79) compared to healthy controls. CONCLUSIONS Infant rhabdoid tumor survivors experience cognitive and quality-of-life sequelae. Patients with AT/RT are especially vulnerable to impairments in fluid intelligence and visual processing, while infant LGG-patients without radiotherapy demonstrated comparable deficits in psychomotor and attention abilities. Close monitoring of neuropsychological and quality of life outcomes is crucial for early onset and multimodal treatment.
Traunwieser et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: