Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) often coexists with hypertension, significantly increasing cardiovascular risks. Lifestyle modification counseling has shown promise in managing T2DM and its comorbidities. However, the optimal frequency and structure of counseling for blood pressure control remain uncertain. Our study examines the best approach for managing blood pressure in T2DM patients by comparing the outcomes of two counseling strategies: a single session and periodic counseling over time. Methodology A total of 110 diabetic patients were enrolled, with 52 patients in each group after loss to follow-up. A randomized controlled trial compared one-time counseling (control) to six months of periodic counseling (intervention) on lifestyle modification. A weighing machine, stadiometer, 24-hour dietary recall, food frequency questionnaire, biochemical blood sugar level analysis, and telephonic follow-up were the essential tools used. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 24.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), employing descriptive statistics, including frequencies, percentages, graphs, mean, and standard deviation. Statistical significance at the 5% level was tested using probability (p) calculations. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test confirmed normal distribution (p > 0.05). Parametric tests, specifically independent t-tests, were used for between-group comparisons of continuous variables, while categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. Intragroup comparisons over time employed repeated-measures analysis of variance for continuous variables. Changes within groups after six months were assessed using paired t-tests. All statistical analyses adhered to a significance level of p 0.05). After six months, the intervention group exhibited a trend toward lower blood pressure compared to the control group, but the differences were not statistically significant. The mean systolic blood pressure was 132.15 ± 14.867 mmHg in the control group and 129.15 ± 9.123 mmHg in the intervention group (p = 0.218). Changes in blood pressure over the six-month period showed significant decreases within the intervention group, while changes in the control group did not reach statistical significance. The mean difference in systolic blood pressure in the intervention group was 5.54 ± 9.77 mmHg (p = 0.0001), indicating a notable reduction, while the control group had a smaller and statistically insignificant increase of 2.308 ± 9.388 mmHg (p = 0.082). Conclusions This study addresses a significant gap in the literature by comparing the efficacy of one-time vs. periodic counseling in T2DM management. While periodic counseling shows promise in improving diastolic blood pressure, further research is needed to understand its nuanced effects and optimize lifestyle interventions for T2DM patients.
Malakar et al. (Mon,) studied this question.