Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Binary classification methods encompass various algorithms to categorize data points into two distinct classes. Binary prediction, in contrast, estimates the likelihood of a binary event occurring. We introduce a novel graphical and quantitative approach, the U-smile method, for assessing prediction improvement stratified by binary outcome class. The U-smile method utilizes a smile-like plot and novel coefficients to measure the relative and absolute change in prediction compared with the reference method. The likelihood-ratio test was used to assess the significance of the change in prediction. Logistic regression models using the Heart Disease dataset and generated random variables were employed to validate the U-smile method. The receiver operating characteristic ( ROC ) curve was used to compare the results of the U-smile method. The likelihood-ratio test demonstrated that the proposed coefficients consistently generated smile-shaped U-smile plots for the most informative predictors. The U-smile plot proved more effective than the ROC curve in comparing the effects of adding new predictors to the reference method. It effectively highlighted differences in model performance for both non-events and events. Visual analysis of the U-smile plots provided an immediate impression of the usefulness of different predictors at a glance. The U-smile method can guide the selection of the most valuable predictors. It can also be helpful in applications beyond prediction.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Katarzyna B. Kubiak
Poznan University of Medical Sciences
Barbara Więckowska
Poznan University of Medical Sciences
Elżbieta Jodłowska-Siewert
University of Minnesota
PLoS ONE
University of Minnesota
Poznan University of Medical Sciences
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kubiak et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e694aeb6db64358761ae87 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0303276
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: