Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Context: The comparative outcomes of breast conserving surgery (BCS) with and without cavity shave margins are not well established. We aim to evaluate the impact of each procedure on final margin status and rate of re-excision. Design: A total of 529 breast cancer cases from our institution between 2013-2015 were included. Demographic and clinicopathological data including procedure type, tumor type, grade, margins status, and re-excision rates were collected. H 0.001) and 2) in patients who did not require lymph node excision compared to those who did (OR 4.26, p 0.001). Additionally, patients who had DCIS had a higher rate of re-excision than those with invasive cancer only (OR 5.17, P .001). After adjusting for type of tumor, patients who underwent cavity shaving compared to those who did not, no significant difference was seen in tumor at margins (OR 0.73, p=0.282) or tumor within 2mm (OR 1.14, p=0.512) from margins. However, patients with IDC who underwent cavity shave had a higher proportion of negative tumor at the margins (76.5% vs. 67.0%; p=0.051). We found that patients who had an invasive carcinoma (IC) had a lower risk of having tumor at the margin or within 2 mm from the margin than those with DCIS or DCIS+IC, (p .05). Conclusions: Our data shows that BCS with cavity shave margins is superior with regards to negative margin and re-excision rates when compared to without cavity shave margins. Citation Format: Fadi Zaiem, Anna Numi, Mira Kheil, Asem AbuJamea, Deepti Jain, Omar Abbas, Lauren Larson, Noor Suleiman, Saleh Al-Juburi, Sanaa Awada, Ragad Almsaddi, Hyejeong Jang, Seongho Kim, Nagla Salem, Lydia Choi, Sudeshna Bandyopadhyay, Sunil Jaiman, Rouba Ali-Fehmi. The Significance of Cavity Shave Margins in Breast Carcinoma on Margin Status and Re-excision Rates abstract. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-03-03.
Zaiem et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: